Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Implement jwt for DB envelope tests #152

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Dec 19, 2024
Merged

Implement jwt for DB envelope tests #152

merged 5 commits into from
Dec 19, 2024

Conversation

PatStLouis
Copy link
Collaborator

This adds a couple features:

  • Local zcapInvoker
  • Issuance / Verification for jwt based enveloped VC

Copy link

@dlongley dlongley left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM; if we get any implementations in that need other envelope formats, we can have the implementation config say the supported format and generate some more fixtures or something. Cross that bridge when we get there. Thanks!

@PatStLouis PatStLouis merged commit b47e60b into main Dec 19, 2024
2 checks passed
@PatStLouis PatStLouis deleted the db-envelope-support branch December 19, 2024 20:54
Comment on lines +41 to +43
"@digitalbazaar/did-method-key": "^5.2.0",
"@digitalbazaar/ed25519-signature-2020": "^5.4.0",
"@digitalbazaar/ezcap": "^4.1.0",
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Deps should be sorted.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

after reading this seventeen times

OH! It's not that these three lines are incorrectly sorted/ordered in relation to each other (because these three are correctly ordered, in isolation), but that these three lines are incorrectly sorted/ordered in relation to the lines above and below!

That's several minutes I won't get back...

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants