First version of semantics for triple terms #53
Closed
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
RDF-Semantics with alternative semantics of triple terms
franconi
added
needs discussion
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Please check the minimal extension I made to the
rdf-semanticsdoc, with the new definitions as in the RDF-star "working alternative baseline" spec we voted.Note that I had to make a minor fix to the RDF alternative semantics spec, in order to exclude that
rdf:typebecomes ardf:ReificationProperty.The
rdf-semanticsdoc has been monotonically extended with the necessary new definitions about triple terms.This version implements a minimal change, since it could be possible also to enhance the quality of the current text.
💥 Error: 500 Internal Server Error 💥
PR Preview failed to build. (Last tried on Dec 2, 2024, 2:41 PM UTC).
More
PR Preview relies on a number of web services to run. There seems to be an issue with the following one:
🚨 Spec Generator - Spec Generator is the web service used to build specs that rely on ReSpec.
🔗 [Related URL]([object Object])
If you don't have enough information above to solve the error by yourself (or to understand to which web service the error is related to, if any), please file an issue.