Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

SNOW-1817982 iobound tpe limiting #2115

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Dec 5, 2024

Conversation

sfc-gh-mkeller
Copy link
Collaborator

Please answer these questions before submitting your pull requests. Thanks!

  1. What GitHub issue is this PR addressing? Make sure that there is an accompanying issue to your PR.

    Fixes SNOW-1817982

  2. Fill out the following pre-review checklist:

    • I am adding a new automated test(s) to verify correctness of my new code
    • I am adding new logging messages
    • I am adding a new telemetry message
    • I am modifying authorization mechanisms
    • I am adding new credentials
    • I am modifying OCSP code
    • I am adding a new dependency
  3. Please describe how your code solves the related issue.

    In this PR I introduce a new connection level parameter that can limit the IO-bound ThreadPoolExecutors' sizes.

  4. (Optional) PR for stored-proc connector:

@sfc-gh-mkeller sfc-gh-mkeller self-assigned this Dec 4, 2024
@sfc-gh-mkeller sfc-gh-mkeller added the DO_NOT_PORT_CHANGES_TO_SP Add this label when changes in this PR do not need to be port to SP connector label Dec 4, 2024
@sfc-gh-mkeller sfc-gh-mkeller merged commit 9439854 into main Dec 5, 2024
94 checks passed
@sfc-gh-mkeller sfc-gh-mkeller deleted the mkeller/SNOW-1817982/iobound-tpe-limiting branch December 5, 2024 20:34
@github-actions github-actions bot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Dec 5, 2024
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
DO_NOT_PORT_CHANGES_TO_SP Add this label when changes in this PR do not need to be port to SP connector
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants