Improve-outputGraph

[punkratz312]

melt down 3 for 1 try-block:

[quarkus-bot]

Thanks for your pull request!

Your pull request does not follow our editorial rules. Could you have a look?

• title should count at least 2 words to describe the change properly
• description should not be empty, describe your intent or provide links to the issues this PR is fixing (using Fixes #NNNNN) or changelogs

_{This message is automatically generated by a bot.}

[maxandersen]

@punkratz312 thanks - but what is the improvement you are going for? got a before/after example?

p.s. I saw a bunch of other PR's from you without a description/rationale - I encourage you to put that in as that makes it much easier to review and merge as it provides crucial info on what actually being tried to be fixed.

[punkratz312]

@punkratz312 thanks - but what is the improvement you are going for? got a before/after example?

p.s. I saw a bunch of other PR's from you without a description/rationale - I encourage you to put that in as that makes it much easier to review and merge as it provides crucial info on what actually being tried to be fixed.

Indeed, this is more of a trial to see if it is generally accepted or not. If the initial draft is fine, I’ll refine it properly. Otherwise, I’d have to invest a lot of time in detailed work on a proposal that’s unlikely to get merged. Even though I know a well-written description would increase the chances, I still believe it’s better to check the initial draft first before diving into the details.