add MIT license to classifiers

[wagenrace]

Summary

Adding the classifier back to pyproject should solve the problem of other application (like PyPI and License-scanner) to find the license.
This is related to #1386

Pull Request Check List

• Do not open pull requests from your main branch – use a separate branch!
  • There's a ton of footguns waiting if you don't heed this warning. You can still go back to your project, create a branch from your main branch, push it, and open the pull request from the new branch.
  • This is not a pre-requisite for your pull request to be accepted, but you have been warned.
• Added tests for changed code.
  Our CI fails if coverage is not 100%.
• New features have been added to our Hypothesis testing strategy.
• Changes or additions to public APIs are reflected in our type stubs (files ending in .pyi).
  • ...and used in the stub test file tests/typing_example.py.
  • If they've been added to attr/__init__.pyi, they've also been re-imported in attrs/__init__.pyi.
• Updated documentation for changed code.
  • New functions/classes have to be added to docs/api.rst by hand.
  • Changes to the signatures of @attr.s() and @attrs.define() have to be added by hand too.
  • Changed/added classes/methods/functions have appropriate versionadded, versionchanged, or deprecated directives.
    The next version is the second number in the current release + 1.
    The first number represents the current year.
    So if the current version on PyPI is 22.2.0, the next version is gonna be 22.3.0.
    If the next version is the first in the new year, it'll be 23.1.0.
    • If something changed that affects both attrs.define() and attr.s(), you have to add version directives to both.
• Documentation in .rst and .md files is written using semantic newlines.
• Changes (and possible deprecations) have news fragments in changelog.d.
• Consider granting push permissions to the PR branch, so maintainers can fix minor issues themselves without pestering you.

[SMoraisAnsys]

Duplicates #1387

Note that since #1387 wasn't merged, I assume that the maintainer expects changes in metadata handling. Hopefully this won't be too long and a new release can be performed :)

[webknjaz]

The real blocker is Twine that has a fix in their main branch but hasn't yet been released.

[SMoraisAnsys]

The real blocker is Twine that has a fix in their main branch but hasn't yet been released.

Agreed, if you have the time to bump pypa/twine#1209, maybe this would add visibility :)

[wagenrace]

I closed it, given if in the best case this PR is a duplicate