Create CODEOWNERS #5
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
rezrah
approved these changes
Dec 14, 2023
|
Thanks, Leslie. I've added the team as repo collaborator, which has resolved the error that was occurring in diff view. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Proposing the addition of a CODEOWNERS file assigned to the Primer
brand-reviewersgroup. This should help manage the current ownership of the code in this repo.It should also make it easier to set up review standards and reviewers, which would help ensure contributions and automated PRs like Dependabot updates are addressed in a timely fashion. My hope is that this would, in turn, protect against the kind of friction we encountered when
primer/doctocat's Gatsby version got so outdated it was too painful to update.