Add ability to customize automatic update channels for add-ons #17597
Conversation
|
@coderabbitai review |
WalkthroughThis pull request introduces a comprehensive enhancement to the add-on store settings and update management in NVDA. The changes include a new settings management system for add-ons, introducing more flexible update channel controls, and modifying how warning dialogs and update preferences are handled. The implementation spans multiple files, introducing new classes for settings management, update channel definitions, and updating various GUI components to support these new features. Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🧹 Nitpick comments (7)
source/addonStore/settings.py (1)
37-56: Consider adding file locking mechanism.The settings file could potentially be accessed concurrently by multiple NVDA instances. Consider implementing file locking to prevent race conditions.
def __init__(self): + import portalocker self._storeSettingsFile = os.path.join( NVDAState.WritePaths.addonStoreDir, self._storeSettingsFilename, ) + self._file_lock = portalocker.Lock(self._storeSettingsFile, timeout=1) self._showWarning = True self._addonSettings = {} self.load()source/gui/addonStoreGui/controls/actions.py (1)
100-128: Consider handling radio item group scope.The radio items are added to the menu without explicitly managing their group scope. This could lead to unexpected behavior if multiple update channel submenus are shown simultaneously.
def _insertToContextMenu(self, action: AddonUpdateChannelActionVM, prevActionIndex: int): + # Create a new radio group for each submenu + if prevActionIndex == 0: + self._contextMenu.Break() # Start a new radio group self._actionMenuItemMap[action] = self._contextMenu.InsertRadioItem( prevActionIndex, id=-1, item=action.displayName, )source/addonStore/dataManager.py (1)
356-359: Consider documenting the configuration settingThe TODO comment indicates a future enhancement for incompatible updates. Consider documenting the configuration setting that will control this behavior.
tests/unit/test_config.py (1)
1071-1081: Incorrect docstring for test_profileWithShowWarningSetTrue.The docstring states "Test that a profile with showWarning not set is correctly upgraded" but the test actually verifies migration of showWarning=True.
- """Test that a profile with showWarning not set is correctly upgraded.""" + """Test that a profile with showWarning set to True is correctly upgraded."""source/addonStore/models/channel.py (1)
122-145: Consider adding error handling for invalid addon channel.The method handles invalid update channels but doesn't validate the addon channel parameter.
def _availableChannelsForAddonWithChannel(self, addonChannel: Channel) -> set[Channel]: """Return the available update channels for an addon with the given channel and the update channel set.""" + if not isinstance(addonChannel, Channel): + raise ValueError(f"Invalid addon channel: {addonChannel}") if self == UpdateChannel.DEFAULT: channel = UpdateChannel(config.conf["addonStore"]["defaultUpdateChannel"])user_docs/en/changes.md (2)
9-12: Consider adding version numbers to highlight textThe highlight text could be enhanced by including version numbers, e.g.:
- Add ability to customize automatic update channels for add-ons + Add ability to customize automatic update channels for add-ons (v17597)
169-170: Inconsistent whitespace before section headingThere is an extra blank line before the "Changes for Developers" section that is inconsistent with other section spacing.
- ### Changes for Developers +### Changes for Developers
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (13)
source/addonStore/dataManager.py(5 hunks)source/addonStore/models/channel.py(3 hunks)source/addonStore/settings.py(1 hunks)source/config/configSpec.py(3 hunks)source/config/profileUpgradeSteps.py(2 hunks)source/gui/addonStoreGui/controls/actions.py(7 hunks)source/gui/addonStoreGui/controls/messageDialogs.py(1 hunks)source/gui/addonStoreGui/controls/storeDialog.py(1 hunks)source/gui/addonStoreGui/viewModels/action.py(2 hunks)source/gui/settingsDialogs.py(2 hunks)tests/unit/test_config.py(3 hunks)user_docs/en/changes.md(2 hunks)user_docs/en/userGuide.md(3 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (13)
source/gui/addonStoreGui/controls/messageDialogs.py (2)
Pattern **/*: Focus on code smells, logic errors, edge cases, missing test cases, security flaws and serious issues. Avoid commenting on minor issues such as linting, formatting and style issues. This project uses tabs instead of spaces, do not suggest usage of spaces over tabs. Are there any 'red flags' in this code that might warrant closer investigation from a security standpoint? Explain what makes them suspicious. When providing code suggestions, particularly when requested, ensure GitHub's suggestion format is used, i.e.: suggestion <code changes>
Pattern **/*.py: _, pgettext, ngettext, and ngettext are defined globally, errors for this being undefined can be ignored.
source/config/configSpec.py (2)
Pattern **/*: Focus on code smells, logic errors, edge cases, missing test cases, security flaws and serious issues. Avoid commenting on minor issues such as linting, formatting and style issues. This project uses tabs instead of spaces, do not suggest usage of spaces over tabs. Are there any 'red flags' in this code that might warrant closer investigation from a security standpoint? Explain what makes them suspicious. When providing code suggestions, particularly when requested, ensure GitHub's suggestion format is used, i.e.: suggestion <code changes>
Pattern **/*.py: _, pgettext, ngettext, and ngettext are defined globally, errors for this being undefined can be ignored.
source/gui/addonStoreGui/controls/storeDialog.py (2)
Pattern **/*: Focus on code smells, logic errors, edge cases, missing test cases, security flaws and serious issues. Avoid commenting on minor issues such as linting, formatting and style issues. This project uses tabs instead of spaces, do not suggest usage of spaces over tabs. Are there any 'red flags' in this code that might warrant closer investigation from a security standpoint? Explain what makes them suspicious. When providing code suggestions, particularly when requested, ensure GitHub's suggestion format is used, i.e.: suggestion <code changes>
Pattern **/*.py: _, pgettext, ngettext, and ngettext are defined globally, errors for this being undefined can be ignored.
source/addonStore/models/channel.py (2)
Pattern **/*: Focus on code smells, logic errors, edge cases, missing test cases, security flaws and serious issues. Avoid commenting on minor issues such as linting, formatting and style issues. This project uses tabs instead of spaces, do not suggest usage of spaces over tabs. Are there any 'red flags' in this code that might warrant closer investigation from a security standpoint? Explain what makes them suspicious. When providing code suggestions, particularly when requested, ensure GitHub's suggestion format is used, i.e.: suggestion <code changes>
Pattern **/*.py: _, pgettext, ngettext, and ngettext are defined globally, errors for this being undefined can be ignored.
source/config/profileUpgradeSteps.py (2)
Pattern **/*: Focus on code smells, logic errors, edge cases, missing test cases, security flaws and serious issues. Avoid commenting on minor issues such as linting, formatting and style issues. This project uses tabs instead of spaces, do not suggest usage of spaces over tabs. Are there any 'red flags' in this code that might warrant closer investigation from a security standpoint? Explain what makes them suspicious. When providing code suggestions, particularly when requested, ensure GitHub's suggestion format is used, i.e.: suggestion <code changes>
Pattern **/*.py: _, pgettext, ngettext, and ngettext are defined globally, errors for this being undefined can be ignored.
source/gui/addonStoreGui/viewModels/action.py (2)
Pattern **/*: Focus on code smells, logic errors, edge cases, missing test cases, security flaws and serious issues. Avoid commenting on minor issues such as linting, formatting and style issues. This project uses tabs instead of spaces, do not suggest usage of spaces over tabs. Are there any 'red flags' in this code that might warrant closer investigation from a security standpoint? Explain what makes them suspicious. When providing code suggestions, particularly when requested, ensure GitHub's suggestion format is used, i.e.: suggestion <code changes>
Pattern **/*.py: _, pgettext, ngettext, and ngettext are defined globally, errors for this being undefined can be ignored.
source/addonStore/settings.py (2)
Pattern **/*: Focus on code smells, logic errors, edge cases, missing test cases, security flaws and serious issues. Avoid commenting on minor issues such as linting, formatting and style issues. This project uses tabs instead of spaces, do not suggest usage of spaces over tabs. Are there any 'red flags' in this code that might warrant closer investigation from a security standpoint? Explain what makes them suspicious. When providing code suggestions, particularly when requested, ensure GitHub's suggestion format is used, i.e.: suggestion <code changes>
Pattern **/*.py: _, pgettext, ngettext, and ngettext are defined globally, errors for this being undefined can be ignored.
source/gui/addonStoreGui/controls/actions.py (2)
Pattern **/*: Focus on code smells, logic errors, edge cases, missing test cases, security flaws and serious issues. Avoid commenting on minor issues such as linting, formatting and style issues. This project uses tabs instead of spaces, do not suggest usage of spaces over tabs. Are there any 'red flags' in this code that might warrant closer investigation from a security standpoint? Explain what makes them suspicious. When providing code suggestions, particularly when requested, ensure GitHub's suggestion format is used, i.e.: suggestion <code changes>
Pattern **/*.py: _, pgettext, ngettext, and ngettext are defined globally, errors for this being undefined can be ignored.
source/gui/settingsDialogs.py (2)
Pattern **/*: Focus on code smells, logic errors, edge cases, missing test cases, security flaws and serious issues. Avoid commenting on minor issues such as linting, formatting and style issues. This project uses tabs instead of spaces, do not suggest usage of spaces over tabs. Are there any 'red flags' in this code that might warrant closer investigation from a security standpoint? Explain what makes them suspicious. When providing code suggestions, particularly when requested, ensure GitHub's suggestion format is used, i.e.: suggestion <code changes>
Pattern **/*.py: _, pgettext, ngettext, and ngettext are defined globally, errors for this being undefined can be ignored.
source/addonStore/dataManager.py (2)
Pattern **/*: Focus on code smells, logic errors, edge cases, missing test cases, security flaws and serious issues. Avoid commenting on minor issues such as linting, formatting and style issues. This project uses tabs instead of spaces, do not suggest usage of spaces over tabs. Are there any 'red flags' in this code that might warrant closer investigation from a security standpoint? Explain what makes them suspicious. When providing code suggestions, particularly when requested, ensure GitHub's suggestion format is used, i.e.: suggestion <code changes>
Pattern **/*.py: _, pgettext, ngettext, and ngettext are defined globally, errors for this being undefined can be ignored.
tests/unit/test_config.py (2)
Pattern **/*: Focus on code smells, logic errors, edge cases, missing test cases, security flaws and serious issues. Avoid commenting on minor issues such as linting, formatting and style issues. This project uses tabs instead of spaces, do not suggest usage of spaces over tabs. Are there any 'red flags' in this code that might warrant closer investigation from a security standpoint? Explain what makes them suspicious. When providing code suggestions, particularly when requested, ensure GitHub's suggestion format is used, i.e.: suggestion <code changes>
Pattern **/*.py: _, pgettext, ngettext, and ngettext are defined globally, errors for this being undefined can be ignored.
user_docs/en/userGuide.md (2)
Pattern **/*: Focus on code smells, logic errors, edge cases, missing test cases, security flaws and serious issues. Avoid commenting on minor issues such as linting, formatting and style issues. This project uses tabs instead of spaces, do not suggest usage of spaces over tabs. Are there any 'red flags' in this code that might warrant closer investigation from a security standpoint? Explain what makes them suspicious. When providing code suggestions, particularly when requested, ensure GitHub's suggestion format is used, i.e.: suggestion <code changes>
Pattern **/*.md: Focus on grammar, spelling, and punctuation. Also consider readability and clarity of contents. Ensure that changes follow the style of one sentence per line, suggest changes if this is not met.
user_docs/en/changes.md (3)
Pattern **/*: Focus on code smells, logic errors, edge cases, missing test cases, security flaws and serious issues. Avoid commenting on minor issues such as linting, formatting and style issues. This project uses tabs instead of spaces, do not suggest usage of spaces over tabs. Are there any 'red flags' in this code that might warrant closer investigation from a security standpoint? Explain what makes them suspicious. When providing code suggestions, particularly when requested, ensure GitHub's suggestion format is used, i.e.: suggestion <code changes>
Pattern **/*.md: Focus on grammar, spelling, and punctuation. Also consider readability and clarity of contents. Ensure that changes follow the style of one sentence per line, suggest changes if this is not met.
Pattern user_docs/en/changes.md: Ensure each change log entry references an issue or pull request number. Change log entries can also include a reference to a GitHub author. Examples of valid change log entries: * Item with sub-items (#123, @username): * sub-item * bar (#342) * Item with. Multiple lines. (#143)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
- GitHub Check: Analyze (python)
🔇 Additional comments (26)
source/addonStore/settings.py (3)
16-24: LGTM! Well-structured dataclass implementation.The dataclass is well-documented and follows best practices with appropriate default values.
26-34: Consider tracking the TODO items.The TODO comments indicate plans to migrate state tracking from
addonHandler. This could be important for maintaining a consistent state management approach.Would you like me to help create GitHub issues to track these TODO items for future implementation?
105-131: LGTM! Well-implemented settings management methods.The settings management methods are well-structured with appropriate error handling and documentation.
source/gui/addonStoreGui/viewModels/action.py (1)
174-188: LGTM! Well-implemented action view model.The implementation follows the existing patterns and is well-documented. The use of
lambda aVM: TrueforvalidCheckis appropriate since the channel can always be changed from the installed/update tabs.source/gui/addonStoreGui/controls/actions.py (2)
129-133: LGTM! Well-implemented action list.The
_actionsproperty correctly creates update channel actions for all available channels.
152-164: LGTM! Appropriate menu integration.The update channel submenu is correctly integrated into the context menu with proper filtering based on status.
source/config/configSpec.py (1)
340-343: LGTM! Well-documented configuration setting.The
defaultUpdateChannelsetting is well-documented with clear value ranges and appropriate validation. The comment explaining the 1-based indexing is particularly helpful.source/addonStore/dataManager.py (4)
47-47: LGTM!The import statement is correctly placed and follows the project's import organization pattern.
103-103: LGTM!The
storeSettingsinitialization is placed appropriately in the constructor and follows the initialization pattern of other instance variables.
116-116: LGTM!The
save()call is correctly placed in theterminatemethod to ensure settings persistence.
364-376: Verify the update channel selection logicThe new update channel selection logic looks correct but complex. Let's verify the implementation:
- Gets installed channel from store data or defaults to EXTERNAL
- Retrieves addon-specific update channel settings
- Determines available update channels
- Checks if addon's channel is in available channels
Run this script to verify the update channel selection logic:
✅ Verification successful
Update channel selection logic is correctly implemented
The implementation in
UpdateChannel._availableChannelsForAddonWithChannelproperly handles all update scenarios:
- DEFAULT: Uses user's preferred channel from config
- SAME: Allows updates only within current channel
- ANY: Allows updates across all channels
- NO_UPDATE: Prevents any updates
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the update channel selection implementation # Test: Search for the method that determines available channels ast-grep --pattern $'_availableChannelsForAddonWithChannel($_, $_) { $$$ }'Length of output: 78
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Find Channel related files fd -t f "channel" -i # Search for update channel related code and the method name rg -i "availablechannelsforaddonwithchannel|class.*channel" -A 5 # Backup search for the method name without class context rg "_availableChannelsForAddonWithChannel" -A 5Length of output: 4442
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Get the complete UpdateChannel class implementation rg -U "class UpdateChannel.*?(?=class|\z)" -P source/addonStore/models/channel.py # Get any related helper methods or constants rg "def.*Channel" source/addonStore/models/channel.py -A 10Length of output: 2416
source/gui/addonStoreGui/controls/storeDialog.py (1)
55-55: LGTM!The change correctly uses the new settings management system to access the warning display preference.
source/config/profileUpgradeSteps.py (1)
476-485: LGTM!The upgrade function correctly:
- Checks for existence of old setting
- Migrates the value to the new settings system
- Removes the old setting
- Includes appropriate debug logging
source/gui/addonStoreGui/controls/messageDialogs.py (1)
358-358: LGTM!The change correctly updates the warning preference using the new settings management system.
tests/unit/test_config.py (3)
1049-1050: LGTM: Test class name follows naming convention.The test class name clearly indicates it's testing the upgrade from config version 14 to 15.
1050-1058: LGTM: Test method verifies default profile behavior.The test correctly verifies that the default profile does not set the showWarning attribute as a boolean in the store settings.
1059-1070: LGTM: Test method verifies migration of showWarning=False.The test properly verifies that when showWarning is explicitly set to False in the profile, it is correctly migrated to the store settings.
source/gui/settingsDialogs.py (3)
3265-3266: LGTM: Clean import of UpdateChannel.The import is placed with other imports and follows PEP 8 guidelines.
3267-3280: LGTM: Well-structured combo box setup.The code:
- Uses clear label text
- Correctly filters out UpdateChannel.DEFAULT
- Properly handles accessibility with help event binding
3358-3361: LGTM: Proper handling of 1-based indexing.The code correctly:
- Adds 1 to convert from 0-based UI index to 1-based config value
- Includes clear comment explaining the adjustment
source/addonStore/models/channel.py (2)
58-86: LGTM: Well-documented UpdateChannel enum.The enum:
- Has clear docstrings for each value
- Uses meaningful names
- Follows consistent ordering
87-98: LGTM: Smart handling of default channel display string.The code:
- Avoids recursive dependency
- Includes assertion for safety
- Properly handles localization
user_docs/en/userGuide.md (2)
3081-3082: LGTM! Clear explanation of update notification behavior.The text clearly explains that add-on update notifications will only occur for add-ons with updates available within the same channel by default. This helps users understand the expected behavior.
3094-3115: LGTM! Well-structured documentation of update channel options.The section provides a comprehensive explanation of the default update channel setting, with:
- Clear heading and introduction
- Well-formatted table of available options
- Detailed descriptions of each option's behavior
user_docs/en/changes.md (2)
Line range hint
1-169: LGTM! Well-structured changelog format.The changelog follows a clear and consistent format with major version releases organized chronologically, each containing standardized sections for New Features, Changes, Bug Fixes and Changes for Developers. The Markdown formatting is clean and readable.
Line range hint
1-10000: Verify all GitHub issue references are still validThe changelog contains many GitHub issue references like (#xxxx). It would be good to verify these links still work and point to the correct issues.
✅ Verification successful
Issue references in changelog are valid and accessible
Based on testing a sample of issue references from the changelog:
- Found 1990 unique issue references
- Tested 10 sample issues (5 oldest and 5 newest)
- All tested issues were valid and accessible on GitHub
- References include both issues and pull requests
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check if GitHub issue references are valid # Extract issue numbers and check if they exist via GitHub API rg -o '#\(\d+\)' | while read -r match; do issue=$(echo "$match" | tr -dc '0-9') gh api "/repos/nvaccess/nvda/issues/$issue" >/dev/null 2>&1 || echo "Invalid issue: $match" doneLength of output: 424
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Extract issue numbers from changes.md and verify them echo "Checking GitHub issue references..." # Extract unique issue numbers from changes.md echo "Extracting issue numbers..." rg -o '#\((\d+)\)' changes.md --replace '$1' | sort -u > issues.txt # Check first few issues as a sample (limit API calls) head -n 5 issues.txt | while read -r issue; do echo "Checking issue #$issue..." if ! gh api "/repos/nvaccess/nvda/issues/$issue" --jq '.html_url' 2>/dev/null; then echo "Warning: Issue #$issue may be invalid" fi done echo "Sample check complete. Total unique issues found: $(wc -l < issues.txt)"Length of output: 414
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Extract issue numbers from changes.md and verify them CHANGES_FILE="user_docs/en/changes.md" echo "Checking GitHub issue references..." if [ ! -f "$CHANGES_FILE" ]; then echo "Error: Cannot find $CHANGES_FILE" exit 1 fi # Extract unique issue numbers from changes.md echo "Extracting issue numbers..." rg -o '#\((\d+)\)' "$CHANGES_FILE" --replace '$1' | sort -u > issues.txt # Show total count echo "Found $(wc -l < issues.txt) unique issue references" # Check first 5 issues as a sample echo "Checking sample of issues..." head -n 5 issues.txt | while read -r issue; do echo -n "Checking #$issue: " if gh api "/repos/nvaccess/nvda/issues/$issue" --jq '.html_url' 2>/dev/null; then echo "Valid" else echo "Warning: May be invalid" fi doneLength of output: 483
Script:
#!/bin/bash # First locate and verify the changes file echo "Searching for changes.md file..." fd changes.md echo -e "\nTrying alternate locations..." ls -l user_docs/en/ 2>/dev/null || echo "user_docs/en/ not found" ls -l docs/ 2>/dev/null || echo "docs/ not found" echo -e "\nTesting with a sample file..." # Try to extract from the first changes file found CHANGES_FILE=$(fd changes.md | head -n 1) if [ -n "$CHANGES_FILE" ]; then echo "Found file: $CHANGES_FILE" echo "First few lines:" head -n 5 "$CHANGES_FILE" echo -e "\nTesting issue extraction:" # Try simpler pattern grep -o "#([0-9]\+)" "$CHANGES_FILE" | head -n 5 || echo "No matches with pattern #([0-9]+)" fiLength of output: 1443
Script:
#!/bin/bash CHANGES_FILE="user_docs/en/changes.md" echo "Analyzing $CHANGES_FILE..." # Show a sample of the content to verify issue reference format echo "Sample content (first occurrence of an issue reference):" grep -A 1 -m 1 "#(" "$CHANGES_FILE" echo -e "\nTrying to extract issue numbers..." # Try multiple patterns to ensure we catch the references echo "Pattern 1 results:" grep -o "#([0-9]*)" "$CHANGES_FILE" | head -n 5 echo -e "\nPattern 2 results:" grep -o "#([[:digit:]]*)" "$CHANGES_FILE" | head -n 5 echo -e "\nPattern 3 results:" perl -ne 'print "$&\n" while /#\(\d+\)/g' "$CHANGES_FILE" | head -n 5 echo -e "\nTotal references found:" perl -ne 'print "$&\n" while /#\(\d+\)/g' "$CHANGES_FILE" | wc -lLength of output: 871
Script:
#!/bin/bash CHANGES_FILE="user_docs/en/changes.md" echo "File info:" ls -l "$CHANGES_FILE" echo -e "\nFirst 10 lines of content:" head -n 10 "$CHANGES_FILE" echo -e "\nSearching for lines containing '#':" grep -n "#" "$CHANGES_FILE" | head -n 5 echo -e "\nSearching for lines containing numbers in parentheses:" grep -n "([0-9]" "$CHANGES_FILE" | head -n 5 echo -e "\nSearching for specific issue reference format:" grep -n "(\#[0-9]" "$CHANGES_FILE" | head -n 5Length of output: 2147
Script:
#!/bin/bash CHANGES_FILE="user_docs/en/changes.md" echo "Extracting all unique issue numbers..." # Extract numbers between (# and ) perl -ne 'print "$1\n" while /\(#(\d+)\)/g' "$CHANGES_FILE" | sort -un > issue_numbers.txt echo "Total unique issues found: $(wc -l < issue_numbers.txt)" echo -e "\nChecking random sample of 5 issues..." # Check 5 random issues shuf -n 5 issue_numbers.txt | while read -r issue; do echo -n "Issue #$issue: " if gh api "/repos/nvaccess/nvda/issues/$issue" --jq '.html_url' 2>/dev/null; then echo "Valid" else echo "Not found or inaccessible" fi doneLength of output: 521
Script:
#!/bin/bash CHANGES_FILE="user_docs/en/changes.md" echo "Extracting all unique issue numbers..." perl -ne 'print "$1\n" while /\(#(\d+)\)/g' "$CHANGES_FILE" | sort -un > issue_numbers.txt TOTAL=$(wc -l < issue_numbers.txt) echo "Total unique issues found: $TOTAL" echo -e "\nChecking sample of first 5 issues..." head -n 5 issue_numbers.txt | while read -r issue; do echo -n "Issue #$issue: " if gh api "/repos/nvaccess/nvda/issues/$issue" --jq '.html_url' 2>/dev/null; then echo "Valid" else echo "Not found or inaccessible" fi done echo -e "\nChecking sample of last 5 issues..." tail -n 5 issue_numbers.txt | while read -r issue; do echo -n "Issue #$issue: " if gh api "/repos/nvaccess/nvda/issues/$issue" --jq '.html_url' 2>/dev/null; then echo "Valid" else echo "Not found or inaccessible" fi doneLength of output: 2299
Link to issue number:
Part of #3208
Closes #15261
Summary of the issue:
Add-ons currently only automatically update to the same channel with automatic updates enabled
This is quite restrictive as many people may want the following scenarios:
Description of user facing changes
Added an "update channel" submenu for add-ons on the installed/update tabs of the add-on store.
This allows selecting a specific set of update channels on a per add-on basis.
Added an item to the add-on store settings panel for selecting the default update channel for all add-ons
Description of development approach
Testing strategy:
Known issues with pull request:
Code Review Checklist:
Summary by CodeRabbit
Release Notes
New Features
Improvements
User Experience