-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 173
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat: add COREPACK_ENABLE_STRICT
env variable
#167
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
|
@@ -44,6 +44,8 @@ export async function findProjectSpec(initialCwd: string, locator: Locator, {tra | |
// A locator is a valid descriptor (but not the other way around) | ||
const fallbackLocator = {name: locator.name, range: locator.reference}; | ||
|
||
if (process.env.COREPACK_ENABLE_STRICT === `0`) return fallbackLocator; | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Nit: might not be needed in this PR, but it'd make sense to move the "parsing" logic in a function so we could be sure the same one is used for enableStrict and enableNetwork |
||
|
||
while (true) { | ||
const result = await loadSpec(initialCwd); | ||
|
||
|
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
|
@@ -219,6 +219,34 @@ it(`should allow to call "prepare" without arguments within a configured project | |
}); | ||
}); | ||
|
||
it(`should refuse to run a different package manager within a configured project`, async () => { | ||
await xfs.mktempPromise(async cwd => { | ||
await xfs.writeJsonPromise(ppath.join(cwd, `package.json` as Filename), { | ||
packageManager: `[email protected]`, | ||
}); | ||
|
||
process.env.FORCE_COLOR = `0`; | ||
|
||
await expect(runCli(cwd, [`pnpm`, `--version`])).resolves.toMatchObject({ | ||
stdout: `Usage Error: This project is configured to use yarn\n\n$ pnpm ...\n`, | ||
exitCode: 1, | ||
}); | ||
|
||
// Disable strict checking to workaround the UsageError. | ||
process.env.COREPACK_ENABLE_STRICT = `0`; | ||
|
||
try { | ||
await expect(runCli(cwd, [`pnpm`, `--version`])).resolves.toMatchObject({ | ||
stdout: `${config.definitions.pnpm.default.split(`+`, 1)[0]}\n`, | ||
exitCode: 0, | ||
}); | ||
} finally { | ||
delete process.env.COREPACK_ENABLE_STRICT; | ||
delete process.env.FORCE_COLOR; | ||
} | ||
}); | ||
}); | ||
|
||
it(`should allow to call "prepare" with --all to prepare all package managers`, async () => { | ||
await xfs.mktempPromise(async cwd => { | ||
await xfs.writeJsonPromise(ppath.join(cwd, `package.json` as Filename), { | ||
|
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It's a bit weird that the name is
COREPACK_ENABLE_STRICT
but the default istrue
. You only use this environment variable when you want to disable strict checking.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It follows the same pattern as
COREPACK_ENABLE_NETWORK
. Do you have another name suggestion?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I prefer env vars and booleans alike to always be named "enable" regardless of default value so you don't have to think about double negatives when disabling the "disable" variable.
This allows you to change the default value in the future without renaming the env var which is really nice if the consumer needs to set the env var and doesn't know the version of corepack that will be used.
TLDR: keep it as
_ENABLE_
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Separately tho, it's always weird and confusing when a boolean option has different behavior between "absent" and "false".
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I don't have another naming suggestion given that this follows an existing pattern. I'm not trying to block or delay this with my comment.