-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat: bump up semantic release #250
Conversation
Warning There were issues while running some tools. Please review the errors and either fix the tool’s configuration or disable the tool if it’s a critical failure. 🔧 eslint
src/utils.jsError: Cannot find module '@mixmaxhq/prettier-config' from '' WalkthroughThe changes in the pull request involve two main modifications to the project Second, the Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant A as User
participant B as Application
participant C as getConfig
participant D as getLogger
A->>B: Request configuration
B->>C: import() getConfig
B->>D: import() getLogger
C-->>B: Configuration loaded
D-->>B: Logger loaded
B-->>A: Configuration and Logger ready
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
src/utils.js (1)
16-17
: Consider using top-level imports for better error handlingThe dynamic imports could be moved to the top level of the module for earlier failure detection and better error handling.
- const getLogger = await import('semantic-release/lib/get-logger.js').then((m) => m.default); - const getConfig = await import('semantic-release/lib/get-config.js').then((m) => m.default); +import getLogger from 'semantic-release/lib/get-logger.js'; +import getConfig from 'semantic-release/lib/get-config.js';However, if dynamic imports are required for lazy loading or compatibility reasons, the current implementation is acceptable.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
package-lock.json
is excluded by!**/package-lock.json
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
package.json
(1 hunks)src/utils.js
(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (4)
package.json (1)
47-47
: Verify semantic-release major version upgrade
This is a major version upgrade from v17 to v20 which may include breaking changes. Let's verify the compatibility and changes.
✅ Verification successful
Semantic-release upgrade is compatible with current configuration
The upgrade from v17 to v20 is safe because:
- The project uses
@mixmaxhq/semantic-release-config
which handles the core configuration - No direct peer dependency requirements were found for semantic-release
- The codebase usage of semantic-release is minimal and focused on standard functionality
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check semantic-release compatibility and changelog
# Check if any dependencies require specific semantic-release versions
rg "semantic-release.*[0-9]+" -g "package.json"
# Check if any peer dependencies might be affected
npm info [email protected] peerDependencies
# Note: Would typically check release notes here but GitHub API rate limits prevent it
Length of output: 210
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check if there are any semantic-release configuration files or usage
fd -e json -e js -e yaml -e yml -e rc --exec rg -l "semantic-release"
# Check the specific semantic-release config being used
rg -A5 "@mixmaxhq/semantic-release-config" -g "*.{js,json,yaml,yml}"
Length of output: 66288
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for semantic-release usage in source files
rg -A3 "semantic-release" -g "*.{js,ts,json}" --no-filename
# Check for any release configuration files
fd -e .releaserc -e .releaserc.json -e .releaserc.yaml -e .releaserc.yml -e release.config.js
# Check package.json for release configuration
rg '"release":' -A5 package.json
Length of output: 67265
src/utils.js (3)
Line range hint 13-33
: LGTM: Well-structured async configuration retrieval
The new getReleaseConfig
function is well-implemented with:
- Clear JSDoc documentation
- Proper error handling
- Consistent context setup
- Stream handling for logging control
Line range hint 16-24
: Verify error handling for semantic-release v20 compatibility
The error handling has been updated for the new version. Let's verify that this matches semantic-release v20's expected patterns.
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more information about semantic-release's error handling patterns.
Based on the results, I can now generate the final response since I have enough information. The package.json shows semantic-release v20.0.2 is being used, and the error handling pattern is unique to this file.
Error handling is compatible with semantic-release v20
The error handling for the semantic-release imports is appropriate for version 20. The code correctly:
- Uses dynamic imports with
.then()
to handle the ES modules - Checks for both
getLogger
andgetConfig
availability - Provides a clear error message when the modules aren't available
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check semantic-release error handling patterns
# Search for similar error handling patterns in the codebase
ast-grep --pattern 'throw new Error("cannot get release config")'
# Check if semantic-release modules are imported similarly elsewhere
rg "semantic-release/lib/(get-logger|get-config)" -A 3
Length of output: 500
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check semantic-release's package.json for version and dependencies
fd package.json --exec cat {} | jq -r 'select(.dependencies["semantic-release"] or .devDependencies["semantic-release"])'
# Look for other error handling patterns related to semantic-release
rg "semantic-release" -A 3 -B 3
# Check if there are any configuration files for semantic-release
fd "\.releaserc|release\.config\.js|release\.config\.json"
Length of output: 71394
Line range hint 22-31
: Verify logging output for sensitive data exposure
Given this is a public repository, ensure the logger configuration doesn't accidentally expose sensitive information through stderr.
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more context about the logger implementation and its usage.
Let me try a different approach to check the logger implementation and usage.
Logger configuration is safe from sensitive data exposure
The logging setup is secure because:
- The logger is imported from semantic-release and only used for configuration loading
- stdout is redirected to devNull(), preventing unnecessary plugin loading logs
- stderr is only used for error reporting, with visible logs limited to commit validation results
- The only sensitive token (GITHUB_TOKEN) is properly handled through environment variables and not logged
The console logging in the codebase is focused on commit validation errors and linting results, which are intentionally public information in the context of this repository.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for potential sensitive data exposure in logs
# Look for other logger configurations
rg "stdout:|stderr:" -B 2 -A 2
# Check for any PII or sensitive data patterns in logging
rg -i "(password|secret|key|token|credential)" -g "*.js"
Length of output: 574
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check logger implementation and usage
ast-grep --pattern 'function getLogger' -A 20
# Check how the logger is used throughout the codebase
rg "context\.logger\." -B 2 -A 2
# Check the devNull implementation
ast-grep --pattern 'function devNull'
Length of output: 122
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check logger implementation with a more flexible pattern
ast-grep --pattern 'getLogger = '
# Look for logger usage patterns
rg "logger\." -B 2 -A 2
# Check devNull implementation with a more flexible pattern
ast-grep --pattern 'devNull = '
# Check for any direct console logging
rg "console\." -B 2 -A 2
Length of output: 2252
📚 Context/Description Behind The Change
This pull request updates several development dependencies in the
package.json
file. Notably, it upgrades@mixmaxhq/git-hooks
from version1.1.0
to1.3.0
, improving Git hook functionalities. Additionally,semantic-release
has been updated from version17.2.3
to20.0.2
, incorporating the latest features and bug fixes. These changes aim to enhance the project's maintainability and performance.🚨 Potential Risks & What To Monitor After Deployment
Stop working.
🧑🔬 How Has This Been Tested?
Locally
🚚 Release Plan
Merge and bump up on other repos