-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 70
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add llamatune checks with quantized values #814
Add llamatune checks with quantized values #814
Conversation
These changes are mainly to add flexibility to the auth service in supporting azure authenticating via: - A personal identity via az CLI for the local dev environment. This will still run into expiring issues, but is probably fine for local dev. - A personal or managed identity in an azure hosted environment. The flexibility to use the managed identity allows us to avoid the expiring issue without needing a separate SP, key-vault and cert setup, aligning with new security recommendations. --------- Co-authored-by: Eu Jing Chua <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Sergiy Matusevych <[email protected]>
Mypy got updated to v 1.11 recently We need these mypy fixes to make other PRs pass the CI tests
Closes microsoft#785 Also, add more unit tests to make sure the optimizer handles string inputs correctly. --------- Co-authored-by: Brian Kroth <[email protected]>
…sergiym/opt/llamatune_inv
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The code looks good. Let's make CI pass and merge it in. I don't care in which order this PR goes in, before or after the quantization update.
* move monkey_patch_quantization and its unit tests to mlos_core * SMAC suggests slightly different config now
mlos_bench/mlos_bench/tests/tunables/tunable_to_configspace_test.py
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
@motus concerned this isn't working quite right yet since the result output isn't quantized as expected (e.g., the test values that were reverted in the PR you made against mine in bpkroth#59). Let's start another PR to make sure that is working as expected and we get the quantization in the the |
Follow on to #812
Closes #813