Make 'Usage' section in README consistent with current Basic Example at current documentation #583
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The current Basic Example in the documentation here uses:
This is nice/explicit and emphasizes you need
ipympl
installed. The documentation there further reads, 'Alternatively you can use%matplotlib widget
which will have the same effect.' This is good because lets legacy users know they can still use%matplotlib widget
.However, the current README at the ipympl Github repo suggest usage here in 'Usage' section only as
%matplotlib widget
.It would be nice if it was consistent and explicit as I see users posting as if
%matplotlib ipympl
and%matplotlib widget
are distinct, despite modern Jupyter needingipympl
.