Making Password storage safer for all
- State of the art password hashing algorithm (Argon2id)
- Safe defaults for most applications
- Future-proof so work factors and hashing algorithms can be easily upgraded
const securePassword = require('secure-password')
// Initialise our password policy
const pwd = securePassword()
const userPassword = Buffer.from('my secret password')
async function run () {
// Register user
const hash = await pwd.hash(userPassword)
// Save hash somewhere
const result = await pwd.verify(userPassword, hash)
switch (result) {
case securePassword.INVALID_UNRECOGNIZED_HASH:
return console.error('This hash was not made with secure-password. Attempt legacy algorithm')
case securePassword.INVALID:
return console.log('Invalid password')
case securePassword.VALID:
return console.log('Authenticated')
case securePassword.VALID_NEEDS_REHASH:
console.log('Yay you made it, wait for us to improve your safety')
try {
const improvedHash = await pwd.hash(userPassword)
// Save improvedHash somewhere
} catch (err)
console.error('You are authenticated, but we could not improve your safety this time around')
}
break
}
}
run()
Make a new instance of SecurePassword
which will contain your settings. You
can view this as a password policy for your application. opts
takes the
following keys:
// Initialise our password policy (these are the defaults)
const pwd = securePassword({
memoryCost: securePassword.defaults.memoryCost,
timeCost: securePassword.defaults.timeCost
})
They're both constrained by the constants SecurePassword.limits.memoryCost.min
-
SecurePassword.limits.memoryCost.max
and
SecurePassword.limits.timeCost.min
- SecurePassword.limits.timeCost.max
. If not provided
they will be given the default values SecurePassword.defaults.memoryCost
and
SecurePassword.defaults.timeCost
which should be fast enough for a general
purpose web server without your users noticing too much of a load time. However
your should set these as high as possible to make any kind of cracking as costly
as possible. A load time of 1s seems reasonable for login, so test various
settings in your production environment.
The settings can be easily increased at a later time as hardware most likely improves (Moore's law) and adversaries therefore get more powerful. If a hash is attempted verified with weaker parameters than your current settings, you get a special return code signalling that you need to rehash the plaintext password according to the updated policy. In contrast to other modules, this module will not increase these settings automatically as this can have ill effects on services that are not carefully monitored.
Takes Buffer password
and hashes it. The hashing is done on the same thread as
the event loop, therefore normal execution and I/O will be blocked.
The function may throw
a potential error, but most likely return
the Buffer hash
.
password
must be a Buffer of length SecurePassword.defaults.passwordLength.min
- SecurePassword.defaults.passwordLength.max
.
hash
will be a Buffer any length based on the config parameters.
Takes Buffer password
and hashes it and then safely compares it to the
Buffer hash
. The hashing is done by a seperate worker as to not block the
event loop, so normal execution and I/O can continue.
The promise is rejected with potential error, or resolved with one of the symbols
SecurePassword.INVALID
, SecurePassword.VALID
, SecurePassword.VALID_NEEDS_REHASH
or SecurePassword.INVALID_UNRECOGNIZED_HASH
.
Check with strict equality for one the cases as in the example above.
If enum === SecurePassword.VALID_NEEDS_REHASH
you should call pwd.hash
with
password
and save the new hash
for next time. Be careful not to introduce a
bug where a user trying to login multiple times, successfully, in quick succession
makes your server do unnecessary work.
password
must be a Buffer of length SecurePassword.defaults.passwordLength.min
- SecurePassword.defaults.passwordLength.max
.
hash
will be a Buffer any length based on the config parameters.
The password was verified and is valid
The password was invalid
The password was verified and is valid, but needs to be rehashed with new parameters
The hash was unrecognized and therefore could not be verified. As an implementation detail it is currently very cheap to attempt verifying unrecognized hashes, since this only requires some lightweight pattern matching.
{
hashLength: 32,
saltLength: 16,
timeCost: 3,
memoryCost: 65536,
parallelism: 1,
type: 2,
version: 19
}
{
hashLength: { max: 4294967295, min: 4 },
memoryCost: { max: 4294967295, min: 2048 },
timeCost: { max: 4294967295, min: 2 },
parallelism: { max: 16777215, min: 1 },
passwordLength: { min: 0, max: 4294967295 }
}
npm install @livingdocsIO/secure-password
Thanks to [Emil Bay] for maintaing https://github.com/emilbayes/secure-password, which this work is built on.