Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

refactor: use pomxmlnet extractor from scalibr #1586

Merged
merged 10 commits into from
Feb 12, 2025
Merged

Conversation

cuixq
Copy link
Contributor

@cuixq cuixq commented Feb 7, 2025

Considering that pomxmlnet extractor is available in scalibr, this PR switches to use scalibr for the extractor, and also removes it from the existing codebase.

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Feb 7, 2025

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 81.81818% with 2 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 68.99%. Comparing base (0e95af5) to head (f5564ca).

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
pkg/osvscanner/internal/scanners/lockfile.go 71.42% 1 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #1586      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   69.33%   68.99%   -0.34%     
==========================================
  Files         200      199       -1     
  Lines       19042    18922     -120     
==========================================
- Hits        13202    13055     -147     
- Misses       5134     5175      +41     
+ Partials      706      692      -14     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@cuixq cuixq requested a review from another-rex February 11, 2025 05:03
@cuixq cuixq merged commit 6ecc827 into google:main Feb 12, 2025
13 checks passed
@cuixq cuixq deleted the pomxml branch February 12, 2025 04:39
cuixq added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 12, 2025
another-rex pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 12, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants