docs: update pyproject.toml and readme #107
Conversation
|
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces minor updates to the project's documentation and metadata. The changes include expanding the project description in Changes
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
README.rst(1 hunks)pyproject.toml(1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- README.rst
🔇 Additional comments (2)
pyproject.toml (2)
9-9: LGTM! Keywords are consistent with package description
The added keywords align well with the updated description and follow proper formatting.
7-7: Verify the availability of newly listed tools
The description now includes clang-query and clang-apply-replacements. Let's verify that these tools are actually included in the package installation.
✅ Verification successful
Description accurately reflects package functionality
The description update is correct and consistent with the package's functionality. Both clang-query and clang-apply-replacements are:
- Referenced in test cases (
tests/test_install.py) - Documented in the README.rst
- Listed as supported tools in multiple places
- Part of the package's core functionality alongside clang-format and clang-tidy
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check if the new tools are referenced in the installation code
# Search for references to the new tools in the source code
echo "Searching for clang-query references:"
rg -i "clang-query" --type python
echo "Searching for clang-apply-replacements references:"
rg -i "clang-apply-replacements" --type python
Length of output: 338
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try searching without file type restriction and also check setup files
echo "Searching for clang-query references:"
rg -i "clang-query"
echo -e "\nSearching for clang-apply-replacements references:"
rg -i "clang-apply-replacements"
echo -e "\nChecking setup.py and related files:"
fd -e py -e cfg -e ini setup
Length of output: 1863
| license = {text = "MIT License"} | ||
| authors = [ | ||
| { name = "Xianpeng Shen", email = "[email protected]" }, | ||
| { name = "Brendan Doherty", email = "[email protected]" }, | ||
| ] | ||
| classifiers = [ | ||
| # https://pypi.org/pypi?%3Aaction=list_classifiers | ||
| "Development Status :: 4 - Beta", | ||
| "Development Status :: 5 - Production/Stable", |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Based on the comprehensive verification results, I can now provide the final response:
Production status upgrade needs additional criteria to be met
The project shows good engineering practices with:
- Comprehensive test suite with unit tests for core functionality
- Robust CI/CD pipeline with multiple workflows
- Wide platform support (Windows, macOS, Linux)
- Version compatibility testing (Python 3.10)
However, some production-readiness criteria are missing:
- No README.md found for user documentation
- No CHANGELOG.md for tracking breaking changes
- No test coverage metrics visible
- No conftest.py for shared test configurations
The status should remain at Beta (4) until these gaps are addressed.
🔗 Analysis chain
Verify production readiness criteria
Upgrading from Beta to Production/Stable is a significant change that implies production readiness. Let's verify this status change is justified.
Let me gather more information about the project's stability and production readiness.
Let me gather one final piece of information about test coverage and documentation quality.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for indicators of production readiness
# Check for presence of tests
echo "Checking test coverage:"
fd -e py -p "test_.*\.py$"
# Check for recent releases and tags
echo "Checking release history:"
git tag -l --sort=-creatordate | head -n 5
# Check for open critical issues
echo "Checking for critical issues:"
gh issue list --label "bug" --state open --limit 10
Length of output: 372
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check test quality and CI status
echo "Checking test configurations:"
cat tests/conftest.py 2>/dev/null || echo "No conftest.py found"
echo -e "\nChecking CI workflow:"
fd -e yml -e yaml . .github/workflows/
cat $(fd -e yml -e yaml . .github/workflows/) 2>/dev/null
# Check documentation completeness
echo -e "\nChecking documentation:"
fd "README|CONTRIBUTING|CHANGELOG" -e md
# Check version history stability
echo -e "\nChecking version history:"
git log --oneline -n 10
Length of output: 9045
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check test coverage report and documentation
echo "Checking test contents:"
cat tests/test_*.py
echo -e "\nChecking documentation quality:"
cat README.md CONTRIBUTING.md
Length of output: 7961
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #107 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 95.42% 95.42%
=======================================
Files 7 7
Lines 284 284
=======================================
Hits 271 271
Misses 13 13 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
shenxianpeng
added
documentation
Summary by CodeRabbit
Documentation
New Features
Other Changes