Implement a basic set of node and edge errors

[msschwartz21]

Closes #181 by implementing a set of node and edge errors outside of the CTC errors. Currently, these errors only support one to one matching, but they could be extended to support many-to-many in the future if desired. I updated the metrics and docs accordingly.

FYI, I'm open to a name other than BasicErrors and BasicMetrics, but couldn't come up with anything better 😅

For the documentation of the metrics, I kept it pretty minimal and assumed that people know/can google precision/recall/f1, but if you think I should elaborate more let me know.

Types of Changes

What types of changes does your code introduce? Delete those that do not apply.

• New feature or enhancement

Which topics does your change affect? Delete those that do not apply.

• Track Errors
• Metrics

Checklist

Put an x in the boxes that apply. You can also fill these out after creating the PR. If you're unsure about any of them, don't hesitate to ask. We're here to help! This is simply a reminder of what we are going to look for before merging your code.

• I have read the developer/contributing docs.
• I have added tests that prove that my feature works in various situations or tests the bugfix (if appropriate).
• I have checked that I maintained or improved code coverage.
• I have checked the benchmarking action to verify that my changes did not adversely affect performance.
• I have written docstrings and checked that they render correctly in the Read The Docs build (created after the PR is opened).
• I have updated the general documentation including Metric descriptions and example notebooks if necessary.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 95.45%. Comparing base (31be450) to head (1f8b78b).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #204      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   95.00%   95.45%   +0.45%     
==========================================
  Files          18       20       +2     
  Lines         921     1013      +92     
==========================================
+ Hits          875      967      +92     
  Misses         46       46              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[cmalinmayor]

Generally looks great, just left a few comments on the code. The tests are so sensible and complete 😄 I love it. One potential problem is that I tried to look at the docs and it seems that the build is not working in the PR? Not sure if that is just a one-time issue or if there is something actually wrong, but if you could investigate that would also be great.