-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 69
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. Weβll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Introducing consistency in colors for deposits across pages #8382
Merged
Merged
Changes from 4 commits
Commits
Show all changes
12 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
f246955
Introducing consistency in deposits across pages
naman03malhotra 2593bcb
removed unwanted changes
naman03malhotra ed43d85
added changelog
naman03malhotra 9d8c275
Merge branch 'develop' into fix/7761-align-deposit-colors
jessy-p e9725aa
Merge branch 'develop' into fix/7761-align-deposit-colors
shendy-a8c b0825cf
Merge branch 'develop' into fix/7761-align-deposit-colors
haszari b44de0e
Merge branch 'develop' into fix/7761-align-deposit-colors
Jinksi a472872
Remove whitespace changes to keep PR changes focused
Jinksi cf2d289
Update colors to match design
Jinksi c8352f4
Update deposit status chip colors to match design
Jinksi c15d738
Merge branch 'develop' into fix/7761-align-deposit-colors
997e6c3
Merge branch 'develop' into fix/7761-align-deposit-colors
Jinksi File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,4 @@ | ||
Significance: patch | ||
Type: fix | ||
|
||
Introducing consistency in colors for deposits across pages |
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There is an image shared in the issue with slightly different brighter shades ( probably studio ) . I had to recopy this image here since it had some weird private URL.
We may want to use the wp-admin shade equivalents, that are slightly darker / a bit dull compared to the screenshot in the issue. @rogermattic may kindly reconfirm.
As per the
Acceptable
criteria in the issue, we need to use shades of blue for in transit.So maybe
The gray color may end up looking almost black, though.
We probably need a different shade?