-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 8
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Cherry-pick 0.4.0 release related changes into 1deg_iaf #167
Conversation
!test repro |
✅ The Bitwise Reproducibility Check Succeeded ✅ When comparing:
Further informationThe experiment can be found on Gadi at The checksums generated by this The checksums compared against are found here https://github.com/ACCESS-NRI/access-om3-configs/tree/4259d19457011d74586789b5f6b65a9ff06f404c/testing/checksum |
See COSIMA/access-om3#251 Co-authored-by: minghangli-uni <[email protected]>
payu-org/payu#496 Removed some checks in Payu which required unused components to be present in the nuopc.runconfig file. Co-authored-by: Dougie Squire <[email protected]>
The new build uses openmpi4.1.7, which fixes some bugs preventing parallel reads over symlinks. This allows use of parallelio netcdf4 option, even though at this resolution for most components we will still only use one PE for IO.
This only affects the logging, the actual value is hardcoded through a #ifdef CESMCOUPLED
581d4e8
to
240b86f
Compare
!test repro |
Note, I rebased everything onto the latest |
❌ The Bitwise Reproducibility Check Failed ❌ When comparing:
Further informationThe experiment can be found on Gadi at The checksums generated by this The checksums compared against are found here https://github.com/ACCESS-NRI/access-om3-configs/tree/3ded30a1df427d8238695ca182705203d0b275c9/testing/checksum |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@minghangli-uni, would be great to get your eyes on this also so I'm not approving my own changes
I can't review my own PR but this needs update checksums committed. I think the pipeline is broken, don't merge just yet ! |
!test repro commit |
❌ The Bitwise Reproducibility Check Failed ❌ When comparing:
🔧 The checksums will be committed to this PR, as they differ. Further informationThe experiment can be found on Gadi at The checksums generated by this The checksums compared against are found here https://github.com/ACCESS-NRI/access-om3-configs/tree/3ded30a1df427d8238695ca182705203d0b275c9/testing/checksum |
@minghangli-uni , Tommy has now fixed the workflow and the new checksums have been committed. Are you happy with this PR? |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM. But @dougiesquire you are @ a wrong person 😆
I think I should run a test repro before merging |
!test repro |
❌ The Bitwise Reproducibility Check Failed ❌ When comparing:
Further informationThe experiment can be found on Gadi at The checksums generated by this The checksums compared against are found here https://github.com/ACCESS-NRI/access-om3-configs/tree/3ded30a1df427d8238695ca182705203d0b275c9/testing/checksum |
Sorry, not again! |
Hmmm, the workflow is committing the updated checksums to |
07ff320
to
9ebbf2e
Compare
General comment. I noticed that there are large diffs in |
Yup |
Yes this is implementing COSIMA/access-om3#200 - i.e reordering MOM_input to follow MOM_parameter_docs It will make it easier to compare any differences and sync across configs later if desired (i.e. COSIMA/access-om3#198) |
!test repro commit |
❌ The Bitwise Reproducibility Check Failed ❌ When comparing:
🔧 The checksums will be committed to this PR, as they differ. Further informationThe experiment can be found on Gadi at The checksums generated by this The checksums compared against are found here https://github.com/ACCESS-NRI/access-om3-configs/tree/3ded30a1df427d8238695ca182705203d0b275c9/testing/checksum |
Cherry-pick changes from #161
The comparison between this branch and def-1deg_jra55do_ryf is useful to compare MOM_input:
https://github.com/ACCESS-NRI/access-om3-configs/compare/209-dev-1deg_jra55do_iaf..dev-1deg_jra55do_ryf