You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Nov 7, 2024. It is now read-only.
Not sure about the meaning of "the sensitivity of all kinds of information" but, unless redundant, could "inferring restricted sensitive information from cross-referencing not restricted sensitive information" be mentioned?
Like the "minority inferred by language preferences" example in Sensitive information disclosure, a disability status could also be inferred by bits of information that are not restricted sensitive information on their own.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Generally, if it's possible to confidently infer sensitive information from a set of other information, that makes the concurrent disclosure of all of that other information also sensitive. I think it does make sense for this document to say something about how confident that inference needs to be, but I'm not sure what it should say.
Could you send a pull request with the wording change you're thinking of?
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Not sure about the meaning of "the sensitivity of all kinds of information" but, unless redundant, could "inferring restricted sensitive information from cross-referencing not restricted sensitive information" be mentioned?
Like the "minority inferred by language preferences" example in Sensitive information disclosure, a disability status could also be inferred by bits of information that are not restricted sensitive information on their own.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: