You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
For some parts of navigation we currently have a machanism whereby we suppress an event when it's caused by the context.navigate command and then later re-emit it explictly. That's used to ensure the command has returned before the event is emitted, so clients always have the relevant navigation ids. But the mechanism is unsatisfactory; it would be better to just queue a (micro)task to emit the event in all cases; generally one won't be able to tell the difference, but in the case we invoke the navigation it would give the correct ordering.
We are making use of queue a microtask in the "wait" mechanism, but that is wrong in detail; it depends on an event loop. But the WebDriver spec conceptually doesn't run in a specific js context; it's running in the parent/UI process. So it's unclear to me if we can assume apriori that there is an agent to execute the event loop (at least without handwaving one into existence).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
For some parts of navigation we currently have a machanism whereby we suppress an event when it's caused by the
context.navigate
command and then later re-emit it explictly. That's used to ensure the command has returned before the event is emitted, so clients always have the relevant navigation ids. But the mechanism is unsatisfactory; it would be better to just queue a (micro)task to emit the event in all cases; generally one won't be able to tell the difference, but in the case we invoke the navigation it would give the correct ordering.We are making use of queue a microtask in the "wait" mechanism, but that is wrong in detail; it depends on an event loop. But the WebDriver spec conceptually doesn't run in a specific js context; it's running in the parent/UI process. So it's unclear to me if we can assume apriori that there is an agent to execute the event loop (at least without handwaving one into existence).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: