Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

are directional strings a required datatype for RDF entailment? #139

Open
pfps opened this issue Dec 21, 2024 · 1 comment
Open

are directional strings a required datatype for RDF entailment? #139

pfps opened this issue Dec 21, 2024 · 1 comment

Comments

@pfps
Copy link
Contributor

pfps commented Dec 21, 2024

What are the required datatypes for RDF processors (from Semantics)? There is a PR w3c/rdf-semantics#64 to add directional strings to the list, but I do not know of any WG decision to add this datatype to those required for RDF processors.

@afs
Copy link
Contributor

afs commented Dec 22, 2024

https://www.w3.org/2024/09/24-rdf-star-minutes.html#d0a5
https://www.w3.org/2023/09/28-rdf-star-minutes#r03

rdf:langString is called out for special, normative treatment in RDF 1.1 Semantics. Semantic extensions must use this noted exception for determining the value.

rdf:dirLangString will have to have to similar treatment.

@pfps pfps changed the title required datatypes are directional strings a required datatype for RDF entailment? Jan 8, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants