You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
When calculating the Qini score, we use the area under the Qini curve and subtract the random value. In the code, we generate a Qini curve by assigning random scores to each sample and then use the area under this curve as the random value. However, in many cases, the random value is directly set to 0.5. There is a significant difference between these two methods of calculation. How should we understand this discrepancy?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Thanks for your question, @zju-lyx. We updated the uplift/Qini curve and score calculation to use the theoretical random instead of the sampled random in #799. With the change, the normalized AUUC and Qini scores for random are always 0.5 and 0.0, respectively.
When calculating the Qini score, we use the area under the Qini curve and subtract the random value. In the code, we generate a Qini curve by assigning random scores to each sample and then use the area under this curve as the random value. However, in many cases, the random value is directly set to 0.5. There is a significant difference between these two methods of calculation. How should we understand this discrepancy?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: