Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Workspace metadata modifications mutilates the Metadata responses #9409

Open
BOHEUS opened this issue Jan 6, 2025 · 2 comments
Open

Workspace metadata modifications mutilates the Metadata responses #9409

BOHEUS opened this issue Jan 6, 2025 · 2 comments

Comments

@BOHEUS
Copy link
Contributor

BOHEUS commented Jan 6, 2025

Do not reproduce it unless you're willing to lose your data

Scenario:

  1. Log in
  2. Go to Settings > Data Model and create new object
  3. In Settings toggle Advanced
  4. Go to API & Webhooks
  5. Create new API key, copy it
  6. Using this endpoint find ID of newly created object from step 2
  7. Using attached bash script fields_spam.txt create 500 fields (replace URL and API key before running)

Actual: At around 400 fields in 1 object (~500 fields in total) app starts showing less fields compared to all fields in database but works, at over 500 fields (~600 fields in total) in 1 object app is broken and even though it shows records, records are "duplicated" and checking any of them results in error and conditional refresh

Screencast.From.2025-01-06.16-46-11.mp4

Expected: To be decided

@arnavsaxena17
Copy link
Contributor

Hi, it is important for us to solve this bug - if someone from the core team can help understand what is happening/ ideas on how to fix, I would like to contribute and fix this.

@lucasbordeau
Copy link
Contributor

Could you see if it could be a problem with the creation of view fields ? I think that the field metadata item aren't the concern but instead when we create / modify view fields too fast.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
Status: 🆕 New
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants