-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 241
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Evaluate Placement of MusicBlocks and TurtleBlocks in the Activities Section #631
Comments
Experience Sugar is not using Sugar, but using other software that has a Sugar design and style to it, and is also produced by Sugar Labs. Sugar activities on the other hand generally require Sugar itself, for the Journal experience. Flatpak of some activities reduces that dependency. Just checking, but have you used Music Blocks, Turtle Blocks, Sugarizer and Sugar yourself, or used them in the teaching of a child? |
Thank you for the clarification; I understand it now. I thought that in this section, all were methods to install Sugar, and only these two activities were shown—that’s why I had this question in my mind :) |
Good. Your issue; what is your decision? Will you edit the issue or close? Thanks. |
If the placement of the blocks is intentional, then closing the issue seems appropriate. |
Oh, I can't say intentional as I didn't do it, but I'm happy with the placement. @pikurasa what do you think? |
Description:
Currently, in the "Experience Sugar" section, there are several methods to try Sugar, including MusicBlocks and TurtleBlocks, which are categorized as activities. However, these two activities are not included in the next section that might specifically highlight activities.
Questions:
Should we move these two activities to the next section, or is their current placement deliberate?
(I did not raise a direct PR because I wanted to seek suggestions first.)
Screenshot
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: