Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[support] Feature Requests #57

Open
4 tasks
rishabh3112 opened this issue Aug 29, 2018 · 7 comments
Open
4 tasks

[support] Feature Requests #57

rishabh3112 opened this issue Aug 29, 2018 · 7 comments

Comments

@rishabh3112
Copy link
Contributor

rishabh3112 commented Aug 29, 2018

Here is the list of features that would be implemented or being discussed by the plugin development team.
Features to be implemented

  • Tests ( E2E and Unit Tests )
  • Improve High level CLI design with more info of each question

Features under implementation


Join Slack and move to #feature-discussion channel for feature recommendation and discussion

@sendilkumarn
Copy link
Owner

** Version 1.0 Roadmap **

  • Refactor the entire code
    - [ ] Move prompts to separate file
    - [ ] Handle validations gracefully
    - [ ] Suggest answers rather than just questioning
  • Support webpack-cli migrate command
  • Support making existing applications into PWA
  • Add E2E tests
  • Add Lighthouse tests

Nice to have

  • Migrate to TS
  • Add description to the questions with links

@sendilkumarn
Copy link
Owner

@rishabh3112 take a look at here All the above Under Discussion stuffs we will do it once we have our base strong. What are your views ?

@rishabh3112
Copy link
Contributor Author

Yes, I am looking forward to first make our base strong too @sendilkumarn.
But, I strongly suggest having a final consensus about Under discussion stuffs right now as I think it will enable us to design better code base structure (so that we are able to implement these stuffs without cluttering codebase) as these stuffs will increase the scope of this plugin itself.

@sendilkumarn
Copy link
Owner

Perfect @rishabh3112

That is the reason, I want your views and we should have a discussion and this is my brain dump for that.

@rishabh3112
Copy link
Contributor Author

this is my brain dump for that.

What do you mean here @sendilkumarn?

@sendilkumarn
Copy link
Owner

I mean my idea for the v1.0 release

@AjayPoshak
Copy link
Contributor

I do agree with @sendilkumarn. First we need to make our base strong and then we can easily iterate upon that to expand and add more features.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants