[Bug]: docs links sometimes have incorrect extension #881
Labels
area/documentation
Indicates an issue on documentation area.
kind/bug/confirmed
kind/bug
Indicates an issue
Actual Behavior
If I visit https://openapi-core.readthedocs.io/en/latest/integrations/fastapi.html and click "see
![Screenshot 2024-07-31 at 07 12 11](https://private-user-images.githubusercontent.com/2605791/353714792-c3766255-2da4-453a-a30a-5332d4c6015f.png?jwt=eyJhbGciOiJIUzI1NiIsInR5cCI6IkpXVCJ9.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.SSEu0nYdynsfPIwpJr37Y5f7sWTEKTmz3isg8iRiIlw)
starlette
integration"Then I get a 404, because the extension is .rst
https://openapi-core.readthedocs.io/en/latest/integrations/starlette.rst
Expected Behavior
When I use the side-menu, I can navigate to the same page.
Additionally on the 404 page, I don't have a menu, so I have to use the browser back-button, or delete the path, before navigating to
https://openapi-core.readthedocs.io/en/latest/integrations/starlette.html
Steps to Reproduce
visit https://openapi-core.readthedocs.io/en/latest/integrations/fastapi.html
scroll to the bottom of the main content page.
click on the "see
starlette
integration" link404 😢
OpenAPI Core Version
main
OpenAPI Core Integration
docs
Affected Area(s)
docs
References
this is your documentation page https://openapi-core.readthedocs.io/en/latest/integrations/fastapi.html
Anything else we need to know?
No thanks, but this has been quite a journey to fill out as a user.
Would you like to implement a fix?
No
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: