-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 31
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Germany: Taxation of Airdrops #104
Comments
What makes you think that? It might be difficult to differentiate between taxable airdrops ("irgendeine Leistung erbracht, bspw. personenbezogene Daten angegeben") and none taxable airdrops as descibe by Winheller. We might have to add an additional file, where the user can list all airdrops which shouldn't be count as taxrelevant. |
Exactly, the question is how to define if the user did something to get the airdrop. For example, some airdrops are distributed to investors achieving a certain trading volume within a given time frame. Would this also be a "Leistung"? The user probably would have traded anyways... I like your approach with defining the tax-free airdrops in a file, but we have to define a format for this (similar to the deposits/withdrawals CSV-based matching idea #4). Platform, UTC time and transaction ID if applicable should be sufficient to uniquely identify the airdrop. To be on the safe side, I would also consider all airdrops as tax relevant per default. |
I reviewed the BMF file. |
According to https://www.winheller.com/bankrecht-finanzrecht/bitcointrading/bitcoinundsteuer/besteuerung-airdrops.html and the publication by the German BMF, Airdrops may be considered as "sonstige Einkünfte" in the future.
However, before updating the code accordingly, I think this topic needs some more investigation.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: