@starbeam/peer and frames #3
Unanswered
wycats
asked this question in
Development Discussion
Replies: 0 comments
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
As I mentioned in 0b534b4, we intend for
@starbeam/peer
to be the stable way that multiple versions of Starbeam can coexist in a single process.Exposing
now
andbump
solves the problem for cells versioning, which covers a lot of ground, but it doesn't cover consumption, which is necessary for full interoperability.On the bright side, this problem only comes into play once we make a post-1.0 breaking change, but we should sort it out before 1.0.
Roughly speaking, we want to design a minimal API for consumption that can cover both consuming cells and frames, but without sucking in the whole design of
TIMELINE
, which is actually a pretty good candidate for breaking changes.Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions