We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Hello. I currently map properties from an ontology using the documentation, so e.g., "myont:has_package" becomes "HAS_PACKAGES" in Neo4j.
However, how would I do the same mapping for the 'inherent' Neo4j properties, such as Resource.uri? I've tried:
Resource.uri
'''WITH [{ neoSchemaElem : "MYONT_IRI", publicSchemaElem: "uri" }] AS mappings, "neo4j://com.neo4j/voc#" AS Neo4jUri CALL n10s.nsprefixes.add("neo4j",Neo4jUri) YIELD namespace UNWIND mappings as m CALL n10s.mapping.add(Neo4jUri + m.publicSchemaElem,m.neoSchemaElem) YIELD schemaElement RETURN count(schemaElement) AS mappingsDefined; '''
The mapping shows up fine in n10s.mapping.list, but the field/property name remains unmapped, with uri. Can this be changed?
n10s.mapping.list
uri
If this cannot be done with Neosemantics and can just be done in CYPHER, that's fine. Thanks!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
No branches or pull requests
Hello. I currently map properties from an ontology using the documentation, so e.g., "myont:has_package" becomes "HAS_PACKAGES" in Neo4j.
However, how would I do the same mapping for the 'inherent' Neo4j properties, such as
Resource.uri
? I've tried:The mapping shows up fine in
n10s.mapping.list
, but the field/property name remains unmapped, withuri
. Can this be changed?If this cannot be done with Neosemantics and can just be done in CYPHER, that's fine. Thanks!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: