You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Connection.ObjectCopy (and, therefore, Connection.ObjectMove) issues only a single COPY request to copy an object. However, this leads to large objects being concatenated into a single object. The copy operation is therefore needlessly expensive, or may even fail if the object becomes too large because of the concatenation.
ObjectCopy and ObjectMove should (either automatically or upon explicit choice of the caller) detect large objects and copy only the manifest instead of the entire object.
This issue is especially severe because, at least for SLOs, the caller cannot work around this problem because of #101.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I'd say that if you asked for a copy, then the segments should be copied too, otherwise you've just duplicated the manifest which doesn't preserve the data in the event of a delete, say.
Likewise the move should probably move the segments too.
Having ObjectCopy and ObjectMove do this automatically seems desirable. I'm a bit concerned about the copy or move only half completeing though...
Connection.ObjectCopy
(and, therefore,Connection.ObjectMove
) issues only a singleCOPY
request to copy an object. However, this leads to large objects being concatenated into a single object. The copy operation is therefore needlessly expensive, or may even fail if the object becomes too large because of the concatenation.ObjectCopy
andObjectMove
should (either automatically or upon explicit choice of the caller) detect large objects and copy only the manifest instead of the entire object.This issue is especially severe because, at least for SLOs, the caller cannot work around this problem because of #101.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: