Skip to content

issues Search Results · repo:maidsafe/sn_dbc language:Rust

Filter by

26 results
 (67 ms)

26 results

inmaidsafe/sn_dbc (press backspace or delete to remove)

The recent change to tx naming went from src_tx and dst_tx to spent_tx and dbc_creation_tx. There are a few issues with this. The most obvious one is that there was a clear duality systematization expressed ...
  • oetyng
  • Opened 
    on May 28, 2023
  • #271

Re-enable multisig where it was removed by ringCTs. Now that ringCT are gone, we can re-enable them.
  • grumbach
  • Opened 
    on Feb 9, 2023
  • #220

I think we should replace our bls_bulletproofs with the upstream bulletproofs since we no longer need them to be on the BLS curve, we ll get much better performance and it s audited. Originally posted ...
  • grumbach
  • Opened 
    on Feb 2, 2023
  • #216

#[zeroize(drop)] doesn #39;t implement Drop for enums | Details | | | --- | --- | | Package | zeroize_derive | | Version | 0.7.0 | | URL | https://github.com/iqlusioninc/crates/issues/876 | | Date | ...
  • github-actions[bot]
  • Opened 
    on Oct 19, 2022
  • #208

1. Let s rename PublicKeyBlstMappable to KeyImage once blsttc/blstrs integration is complete. (PublicKeyBlstMappable should not be necessary then) 2. Let s move KeyImage into blst_ringct, and ideally ...
  • dan-da
  • 1
  • Opened 
    on Feb 28, 2022
  • #148

This check should be moved to RingCtTransaction::verify() if it s not already there. Originally posted by @davidrusu in https://github.com/maidsafe/sn_dbc/pull/121#discussion_r805207975
  • dan-da
  • 1
  • Opened 
    on Feb 15, 2022
  • #130

This check should be moved to RingCtTransaction::verify() if it s not already there. Originally posted by @davidrusu in https://github.com/maidsafe/sn_dbc/pull/121#discussion_r805207975
  • dan-da
  • Opened 
    on Feb 15, 2022
  • #129

This check should be moved to RingCtTransaction::verify() if it s not already there. Originally posted by @davidrusu in https://github.com/maidsafe/sn_dbc/pull/121#discussion_r805207914
  • dan-da
  • 2
  • Opened 
    on Feb 15, 2022
  • #128

Should we also call self.confirm_provided_amount_matches_commitment(..)? Originally posted by @davidrusu in https://github.com/maidsafe/sn_dbc/pull/121#discussion_r805205141 danda: maybe, but that would ...
  • dan-da
  • 2
  • Opened 
    on Feb 15, 2022
  • #127

This function should really be defined in blst-ringct. We can keep the key_image method here, but it should delegate to a blst_ringct::key_image(..) for the key-image math Originally posted by @davidrusu ...
  • dan-da
  • Opened 
    on Feb 15, 2022
  • #126
Issue origami icon

Learn how you can use GitHub Issues to plan and track your work.

Save views for sprints, backlogs, teams, or releases. Rank, sort, and filter issues to suit the occasion. The possibilities are endless.Learn more about GitHub Issues
ProTip! 
Restrict your search to the title by using the in:title qualifier.
Issue origami icon

Learn how you can use GitHub Issues to plan and track your work.

Save views for sprints, backlogs, teams, or releases. Rank, sort, and filter issues to suit the occasion. The possibilities are endless.Learn more about GitHub Issues
ProTip! 
Press the
/
key to activate the search input again and adjust your query.
Issue search results · GitHub