You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
(fiveam:def-test foo ()
(fiveam:is (<=1.50.9)))
; Failure Details:; --------------------------------; FOO []: ; 0.9 evaluated to 0.9 which is not <= to 1.5
The text output 0.9 which is not <= to 1.5 doesn't match the test in IS.
Perhaps there should be a special case for such comparisons with two operands?
I assume that FIVEAM expects some sort of equality test there where (+ 2 2) evaluated to 4 which is not = to 5 makes sense, but that's an imperfect heuristic. I think that it may also make fireworks with all sorts of asymmetric binary operators, such as TYPEP.
(reformatted) example:
The text output
0.9 which is not <= to 1.5
doesn't match the test inIS
.Perhaps there should be a special case for such comparisons with two operands?
With three arguments it's not a problem:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: