Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Intuitive way to access the layer properties / deletion #261

Open
opk12 opened this issue Apr 9, 2024 · 3 comments
Open

Intuitive way to access the layer properties / deletion #261

opk12 opened this issue Apr 9, 2024 · 3 comments

Comments

@opk12
Copy link

opk12 commented Apr 9, 2024

  • In the Layer List, the Properties button should not be hidden behind a swipe; this is unintuitive.
    • The Properties button or the Opacity slider could be below the layer entry.
  • The button icons for the layer visibility should be self-descriptive; other GIS apps use the shape of an eye.
    • In the other apps, checkboxes mean what the toolbar buttons will operate on.
  • The Delete button should not be hidden behind a swipe.
    • It could be always visible below the layer entry.
    • It could be auto-shown after a long-tap on the layer, to select the layer as a target for the delete operation.

(edited)

@moovida
Copy link
Member

moovida commented Apr 15, 2024

Hi @opk12 , thanks for your valuable issues, even if I am not able to process them right now due to other work duties, I will look into them as soon as I have time. Just to let you know.

@opk12
Copy link
Author

opk12 commented Apr 16, 2024

Thank you for your great work. No pressure from me. I'm a hobbyist mapper and FLOSS enthusiast myself and know that everyone does their best.

@moovida
Copy link
Member

moovida commented May 27, 2024

For now implemented to eye icon to handle visualization.

The other ones are a bit tricky for how it is implemented. For now keeping this open tough.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants