You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
NIRSpec MOS uses a micro-shutter array (MSA). The open area of each MSA shutter is 0.20" × 0.46" (width in the dispersion direction × spatial direction).
We should be able to make synthetic MSA observations assuming the galaxy is in the centre of the shutter. This should also yield a comparison with the total spectrum.
I think this an additional class beyond SpectralCube, Image, and Sed but the result would look something like an integrated Sed.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
It could be, but it seems overkill to generate the SpectralCube first. In reality you just need a condition on the particles based on their coordinates.
s = (np.fabs(x_arcsec)<0.1) & (np.fabs(y_arcsec)<0.23)
assuming x and y are measured from the centre.
Now, obviously this is sensitive to the position angle but in reality you don't have much control over that.
Although... now I think about it you need to worry about the PSF as well. So maybe you should make the IFU at super-resolution and cut out the rectangle.
NIRSpec MOS uses a micro-shutter array (MSA). The open area of each MSA shutter is 0.20" × 0.46" (width in the dispersion direction × spatial direction).
We should be able to make synthetic MSA observations assuming the galaxy is in the centre of the shutter. This should also yield a comparison with the total spectrum.
I think this an additional class beyond SpectralCube, Image, and Sed but the result would look something like an integrated Sed.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: