Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

UUID organisation - set manually or automatically generated #173

Open
adulau opened this issue Oct 29, 2024 · 2 comments
Open

UUID organisation - set manually or automatically generated #173

adulau opened this issue Oct 29, 2024 · 2 comments
Assignees
Labels
enhancement New feature or request n-list

Comments

@adulau
Copy link
Member

adulau commented Oct 29, 2024

Having a flag/metadata to know if the UUID of an organisation was set manually or automatically generated.

@adulau adulau added enhancement New feature or request n-list labels Oct 29, 2024
@Wachizungu
Copy link
Contributor

Adding some context:

Main idea behind this is that manually set UUIDs are probably more reliable.
Having it set manually is probably also an indication that this UUID is used by them across different systems.

That being said, I'd be even happier with more metadata, some potentially added by tags / taxonomies (some ideas as food for thought):

  • End user indicating whether they use the associated UUID across different systems, or will use the now generated UUID for other systems in the future as well. Perhaps with some info text indicating why this would be smart.
  • A variation to the above: some UUID reliability score
  • Previously used (potentially retired UUIDs) for the organization. Could be a bit similar to CRL in case the UUID successfully got impersonated / compromised.

@iglocska
Copy link
Member

Those are cool ideas. Sounds indeed like a good case for taxonomies.

@iglocska iglocska self-assigned this Nov 11, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request n-list
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants