Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Requesting Generation of the OpenApi (Swagger) specification from Lambda Annotations #1957

Open
2 tasks
jon-armen opened this issue Jan 30, 2025 · 2 comments
Open
2 tasks

Requesting Generation of the OpenApi (Swagger) specification from Lambda Annotations #1957

jon-armen opened this issue Jan 30, 2025 · 2 comments
Labels
annotations feature-request A feature should be added or improved. p2 This is a standard priority issue queued

Comments

@jon-armen
Copy link
Contributor

Describe the feature

Lambda Annotations should cause the ApiGateway to have a swagger specification complete with generated models based on the inputs / outputs of the functions.

Use Case

My team depends heavily on OpenApi specifications. It would be extremely valuable for the generated functions to produce the specs.

Proposed Solution

No response

Other Information

No response

Acknowledgements

  • I may be able to implement this feature request
  • This feature might incur a breaking change

AWS .NET SDK and/or Package version used

Amazon.Lambda.Annotations

Targeted .NET Platform

.Net 8

Operating System and version

Lambda
@jon-armen jon-armen added feature-request A feature should be added or improved. needs-triage This issue or PR still needs to be triaged. labels Jan 30, 2025
@ashishdhingra ashishdhingra added annotations investigating This issue is being investigated and/or work is in progress to resolve the issue. p2 This is a standard priority issue and removed needs-triage This issue or PR still needs to be triaged. labels Jan 30, 2025
@ashishdhingra
Copy link
Contributor

ashishdhingra commented Feb 3, 2025 •
edited
Loading

Just FYR, Swagger for Minimal API example: #1236 (comment)

At high level, appears to be a useful feature request. Needs review with the team.

@ashishdhingra ashishdhingra added needs-review and removed investigating This issue is being investigated and/or work is in progress to resolve the issue. labels Feb 4, 2025
@dscpinheiro
Copy link
Contributor

Previous discussion with a similar feature request: #1763

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
annotations feature-request A feature should be added or improved. p2 This is a standard priority issue queued
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
3 participants
@dscpinheiro @jon-armen @ashishdhingra