Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Addition of Cancers/epilepsy/depression consumables #1253

Open
joehcollins opened this issue Jan 12, 2024 · 9 comments
Open

Addition of Cancers/epilepsy/depression consumables #1253

joehcollins opened this issue Jan 12, 2024 · 9 comments
Assignees

Comments

@joehcollins
Copy link
Collaborator

joehcollins commented Jan 12, 2024

Hi @andrew-phillips-1 - just wanted to open an issue related to the above modules consumables just so I have somewhere to collect any questions as I go along. This issue is linked to PR #1124 where consumables and equipment for these modules is being added. I will close this issue when I have all the consumables/equipment added.

@joehcollins joehcollins self-assigned this Jan 12, 2024
@joehcollins
Copy link
Collaborator Author

First question - in breast cancer (or other cancers where surgery is treatment) should failure to deliver treatment due to lacking consumables still lead to scheduling of palliative care? (currently, if surgery isnt delivered due to lacking consumable availability they will not move to the post treatment HSI where palliation is scheduled)

@andrew-phillips-1
Copy link
Collaborator

oh i thought palliative care was accessible when people reach stage 4 whatever the route. That's the case in the new cervical cancer module. I agree we would want that.

@joehcollins
Copy link
Collaborator Author

joehcollins commented Jan 12, 2024

The current logic (inclusive of consumables) would be that if someone attends HSI_BreastCancer_Investigation_Following_breast_lump_discernible and is able to have a biopsy (consumables are available, test succesfully detects cancer) they are either scheduled for treatment or palliation depending on staging. If the biopsy cant be delivered then they will not receive either treatment or palliation - which i think makes sense as they wouldnt know they had cancer?

@andrew-phillips-1
Copy link
Collaborator

yes that seems right to me also

@joehcollins
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Ok thanks!

@joehcollins
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@andrew-phillips-1 - another question. For the PostTreatmentCheck HSIs in the cancer modules there is no additional testing using the dx_test function to determine new cancer staging (there is a note to suggest that this additional testing is potentially biopsy or ultrasound). Do we want to be using the same test again? I'm just thinking about adding in consumables for that specific HSI

@andrew-phillips-1
Copy link
Collaborator

Hi @joehcollins I actually didn't know whether it would be standard practice to re-do biopsies from time to time to update the staging. Currently (at least in cervical cancer but I think all cancers) people get at most just one attempted curative treatment. So what would be the purpose (in the model at least) of additional biopsies after attempted treatment ? I guess for one you are thinking of reaching stage 4 and an indication for palliative care ?

@joehcollins
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Yes it was that stage 4 link with palliative care i was thinking about after treatment. However i think for now i will just leave as is and you can have a look when its all done?

@andrew-phillips-1
Copy link
Collaborator

yes sounds good

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants