-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 468
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Hysteresis feature doesn't seem to work or just really confusing #2946
Comments
Hysteresis is simply the degree of change required from the last change. If the last point of change was 48 degree, it will be centered around that point. Be aware that hysteresis is ignored at the limits of your graph ( first and last point ). That option can be disabled. Hysteresis doesn't care about the shape of your graph, so if you expect the hysteresis to always applies exactly at a specific point, like around a staircase point, this may be why you got confused. It won't be "centered" around your 50 degree point. The type of behavior you describe looks a lot more like a trigger fan curve. Look it up. |
Does trigger curve help to make coming down the speed harder that getting higher? I see this feature as a "Negative\Positive Bias Offset" so whenever the temp goes up it checks on the graph what speed it should be and sets fan speed higher accordingly. But when temp goes down a step it check on the graph offset by set temperature and only lowers fan speeds if they are lower on that graph with the offset. |
For me, as i basically use the graph as a trigger. It would suffice to implement a Schmitt trigger behavior. But with that it would be more convenient to set the temp for two fronts rather then the middle point usually used to describe Schmitt trigger |
Yes. It needs to hit either the idle or load temp for a change to occur.
That's kind of the idea of "hysteresis only applies on the way down". If you set a 10 deg hysteresis, it will require a 10 degree drop from the last highest point hit. |
Oh, sorry, didn't gather that trigger already works like this.
That what i though but it seems like it is time dependent or something and even with it set to 10 degree it just switches down even with 2-3 degree drop (I've tested it with some stable 0 degree sensor and custom offset sensor) |
@catsuperberg I don't know how you did your test, but try with a file sensor and change the temp manually. Here's a small video I made showing the behavior. hysteresis.mp4 |
Ok, thanks. I get it now. It wasn't working for me because of "ignore hysteresis at minimum and maximum temps". Idk why it should affect anything until you get to the min\max temp which are set at the bottom right of the graph. |
That's what the response time parameter is for. Increase it. |
Hysteresis sounds like a simple and useful feature. But it isn't clear what seems to be the use of hysteresis as it is implemented.
Is it there to create a stairstep effect for people with gradual fan curves?
With the option like "Hysteresis only applies on the way down" and hysteresis set to 10 degrees I'd expect following behavior:
But for now, with a simple stairstep graph it just either shift immediately between fan speed levels no mater if temps go up or down, or if you set response time to something high it lags both on the way up and down.
It would be great to see the implementation like this or another feature that enables this. I find it irritating when fans change speed be it gradually or with distinct steps and for the loads that are shifting right around the point you set on the graph it would be great to force higher RPM until it actually significantly dropped.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: