You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
If you have done crosswalk between any vocabularies and Schema.org, please list them below. This would help to identify gaps between Schema.org and vocabularies already adopted various communities.
For example:
The W3C Data eXchange Working Group has done an alignment of DCAT with Schema.org. A provisional version is available here.
@mingfangwu , this is just to mention that the current work in the W3C DXWG is building upon and extending previous work done by the W3C/OGC Spatial Data on the Web WG, which was in turn based on a number of existing mappings, all listed in their ISO 19115 - DCAT - Schema.org mapping proposal.
Specifically in relation to the European profile of DCAT (DCAT-AP), and its geospatial and statistical extensions (GeoDCAT-AP and StatDCAT-AP, respectively), a comprehensive mapping proposal is available at:
If you have done crosswalk between any vocabularies and Schema.org, please list them below. This would help to identify gaps between Schema.org and vocabularies already adopted various communities.
For example:
The W3C Data eXchange Working Group has done an alignment of DCAT with Schema.org. A provisional version is available here.
The CodeMeta Project has done a crosswalk between Schema.org to about 18 other vocabularies with software in focus.
Australian National Data Services has a crosswalk from RIF-CS to Schema.org. There are ~130K records from Research Data Australia are marked in Schema.org.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: