Replies: 2 comments
-
Yes, I agree, this would be great thing if we could have something like information schema to get the ontology of metadata in database. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
-
Little update, with #1026 we'd be able to describe the graph schema and then render it in Studio. I still think another cool feature would be a command that browses the database and build the dynamic schema with data present in the database, no matter if you defined a schema or not. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
It could be nice to have a way to draw a graph based on types and edges so we can see the abstract graph like we do in a ERD.
This is a short example of relation in the database. There's 134 different class types.
but if I want a DER it should be something like this:
(I omit the name of relationships in the graph and should be added)
I think that if we can register some metadata in the edge, like (type) in (cardinality) - (cardinality) out (type) , the graph could be made.
and if a edge do not have that info it is ignored in the Graph-Relation-Explain graph
The relations should be visible even if no instance exist.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions