You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Both produced blocks and received blocks use the same short name time, which is confusing. It would be cleaner to use producing time and applying time.
cpu field could add postfix us in the same way as other time.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
linh2931
changed the title
time field for produced blocks is wrong and the name time is confused with received block's timetime field for produced blocks is wrong and the name time is confusing with received block's timeOct 1, 2024
The
time
field reported forProduced block
is wrong:node_bios/stderr.2024_10_01_11_52_13.txt:info 2024-10-01T15:53:04.594 nodeos controller.cpp:3475 log_applied ] Produced block 0de718e5b389a264... #104 @ 2024-10-01T15:53:05.000 signed by eosio [trxs: 0, lib: 102, confirmed: , net: 0, cpu: 100, elapsed: 234 us, time: 1727797984594382 us]
This happens in both
main
andrel 1.0
branches.Both
produced blocks
andreceived blocks
use the same short nametime
, which is confusing. It would be cleaner to useproducing time
andapplying time
.cpu
field could add postfixus
in the same way as other time.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: